Sufficient Scruples

Bioethics, healthcare policy, and related issues.

October 20, 2011

Patriarchal Progressives

by @ 5:09 PM. Filed under Autonomy, General, LGBTQ Issues, Personhood, Sex, Theory, Women's Issues

Jill Filipovic, at Feministe, has a great post up on objectification of women within liberal activist circles. It was prompted by the much-commented assholery of one Steven Greenstreet, who took video footage of female demonstrators at OWS protests and put it up on Tumblr, out of context and with no purpose other than inviting leering at the “Hot Chicks of Occupy Wall Street”.

Jill righteously calls him out for it (as did many others):

The deflecting from legitimate concerns, and the fact that the OWS “public” includes a lot of men who think it’s ok to treat women at a protest like we’re there for their visual fulfillment, troubles me. No one is saying, “Don’t find women attractive.” . . . No one is objecting to the fact that straight men are attracted to some women (fun fact: straight women are also attracted to some men! So really, no one is pissed about attraction, I promise). What people are pissed about is what Rebecca Traister says:

“The larger, simpler argument, outside of consent or permission, is: This video is sexist. It’s an example of women participating in public life — political, professional, social — and having their participation reduced to sexual objectification. That’s what happened here, nothing more, nothing less.” . . .

Emphasis mine. . . . [C]reating a blog and a video dedicated to showing women at a protest with the sole purpose of reminding dudes that women at the protest are hot? That does reduce women to objects of male attention. It’s another reminder, for women, that how seriously we’re taken and how valuable we are depends on how sexually attractive we’re deemed.

Read the whole thing; she’s got good things to say. But the part that really triggered something for me was this:

Frankly, the kinds of dudes who would come to the OWS protests because they heard there are hot chicks there? Are not the kinds of dudes I want to be protesting with. I would hope they’re not the kinds of dudes that most progressives would want to be protesting with — but judging by the lefty-dude reaction to Steven Greenstreet (hi Matt Zoller Seitz, looking at you!), that’s not the case. It’s disappointing.

To say the least. And far too common, from way back. It’s no secret that supposedly “progressive” groups have always been rife with sexism and sexual pressuring, and it doesn’t seem to be getting better. Progressives have never been immune to human failings, including stereotyping and bigotry of the kind that they supposedly abhor but sometimes don’t recognize in themselves; the long fight for acceptance in progressive movements of gays and transexuals is one case in point, and the difficulty many white (and especially male heterosexual) liberals have in recognizing and acknowledging their own privilege is another. But the LGBTQ community, people of color, and other marginalized groups, though still embattled, have by now to a considerable degree been granted by progressives the one thing many persist in denying to women: recognition of the fact that they have real interests, problems, and worth that must be taken seriously. The situation is far from perfect, and not everybody agrees on how the tensions between different progressive constituencies should be resolved, but in most cases they are acknowledged, and the human pain and human interests that lie at their heart are given due deference. Except in the case of women.

To be sure, progressives are not right-wingers. They don’t overtly hate women. They don’t gleefully consign them to death by deliberate neglect at the hands of sniffy sex-negative religious bigots. They don’t dishonestly and cynically strain moral concepts – often ones introduced and championed by progressives – such as “informed consent” to create barriers to the very autonomy they are intended to protect. They don’t penalize the fact of women’s having sexual natures – just the opposite! But in too many cases they don’t grant them the respect and freedom needed to act on their own natures and seek their own good. Just as with conservatives, women exist for far too many progressive men for the purpose of their gratification – an impersonal usage that erases those women as persons themselves.

Which leads me, finally, to the question that came up for me on surveying this latest stupid and distasteful incident: how, exactly, are these dipshit “progressive” men progressives? What goes through their heads, what process takes place in their heads, such that they wind up thinking things like “let’s go to the OWS protest and photograph women’s breasts!”? How, when they are called out for that, do they expend so much energy defending their childishness and sexism? Why do they not care about offending or humiliating their supposed fellow activists – about derailing or undermining the movement they claim to support – about embarrassing that movement by acting in a regressive manner and then elevating their own bad behavior into the limelight? More particularly, what is it that allows progressives to empathize with everyone but women, even women in their own movement? What allows them to hear everyone else’s protests at mistreatment, and dismiss those of women out of hand?

In a way, I suppose it has something in common with the denial and self-absorption that allowed Southern slave-holders to rationalize their own crimes. Patriarchy is its own form of slavery, more complex and less overt, but very real, and it is very hard to acknowledge you are doing wrong when your entire lifestyle, all its comforts and conveniences and pleasures, derives so much from others’ service to your needs. It is easy to protest obvious wrongs that don’t require you to change your own life to amend. But progressive men, in many cases, are no better than the privileged classes of the Confederacy, of apartheid South Africa, of Wall Street itself, at admitting that their own satisfaction depends on bending others to their desires, against their will and at the denial of their basic human personhood.

You can’t be progressive just for causes you aren’t invested in, at the expense of people you don’t like. Being progressive means wanting to live in a better world – not just wanting to take down the most guilty in this one and then carry on regardless. Being progressive means checking your privilege, living the dream you envision, being part of the solution – all slogans that have at their heart the basic truth that you have to be as critical of yourself as you are of others, or more so, since you can only really change yourself.

You aren’t a progressive if you mistreat women. You aren’t a progressive if you think progressivism is defined as rallies, protests, and events, rather than a mindset that is grounded on a world in which people are treated with respect, by everyone, starting with yourself. You aren’t a progressive if you go to events but don’t treat the people there with regard. You aren’t a progressive if you revel in your own privileges at the expense of the pain and diminishment of others, then feel hurt because you’ve decided that whatever superficial support you feel for “the cause” entitles you to use others for your pleasure and then resent it when they object.

If you’re not a progressive for any of these reasons, you’re little better than a reactionary even if you vote the right way. You’re pro-choice? Great. You don’t think being pro-choice encompasses the choice to control, and present, your own sexuality on your own terms? You’re not a progressive, and you’re a pain and an embarrassment to those who sincerely try to be.

21 Responses to “Patriarchal Progressives”

  1. On “Hot Chicks Of Occupy Wall Street” and DC’s Relaunch of Starfire | Alas, a Blog Says:

    […] Sufficient Scruples » Blog Archive » Patriarchal Progressives […]

  2. bathroom design Says:

    Great awesome issues here. I am very glad to see your article. Thank you a lot and i’m looking forward to touch you. Will you please drop me a e-mail?

  3. horticulture Says:

    Excellent weblog here! Additionally your site a lot up fast! What web host are you using? Can I am getting your associate link on your host? I wish my web site loaded up as fast as yours lol

  4. jual hairclip Says:

    Very nice article and right to the point. I don’t know if this is in fact the best place to ask but do you guys have any ideea where to get some professional writers? Thank you :)

  5. namioty wojskowe Says:

    I just wanted to post a simple message so as to appreciate you for some of the magnificent concepts you are writing on this website. My rather long internet investigation has at the end of the day been rewarded with extremely good details to talk about with my guests. I ‘d express that many of us site visitors are truly blessed to live in a magnificent community with so many special professionals with great methods. I feel rather blessed to have come across your web page and look forward to plenty of more entertaining minutes reading here. Thank you again for everything.

  6. Jonathan Hart Says:

    Some truly nice stuff on this site , I like it.

  7. Pinoy Teleseryes Says:

    Hello! I just now would select to supply a enormous thumbs up with the great information you can have here within this post. I is going to be coming back to your blog site for additional soon.

  8. Stephanie Mackay Says:

    Greetings, I believe your web site could possibly be having web browser compatibility problems. Whenever I take a look at your site in Safari, it looks fine however, if opening in IE, it’s got some overlapping issues. I simply wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other than that, excellent website!

  9. Kylie Poole Says:

    Thanks very nice blog!Also visit my homepage: league of legends codes (Lien)

  10. Trevor Thomson Says:

    Hello. splendid job. I did not expect this. This is a splendid story. Thanks!

  11. Lisa Vaughan Says:

    Captain Randall, who just happens to be the spitting image of his descendant clothed in full redcoat regalia, is a ruthless adversary who will complicate Claire’s life over and over again. pouffed pouffes poulard poulter poultry pounced pouncer pounces. foggages foggiest foghorns fogyisms foilable foilsman foilsmen foisting.

  12. digital sign rental trailer Says:

    Regards for this post, I’m a big fan of this site would like to go along updated.

  13. vermikompost uretimi Says:

    of course like your web-site nonetheless you need to check the spelling on quite several of your posts. Quite a few them are rife with spelling issues and I to uncover it extremely bothersome to inform the reality even so I’ll surely come back once again.

  14. vaillance courtage Says:

    I only wish that I had the ability to convey what I wanted to say in the manner which you have presented this details. Thanks.

  15. apartheid south africa footage Says:

    Can I give you a donate for future posting?

  16. Leia Paris Says:

    What i don’t realize is actually how you’re now not really much more well-appreciated than you may be now. You’re very intelligent. You recognize thus significantly in terms of this subject, produced me in my view consider it from numerous numerous angles. Its like women and men are not interested except it is one thing to do with Lady gaga! Your individual stuffs excellent. All the time handle it up!

  17. Granville Chillis Says:

    You have brought up a very good details , thanks for the post.

  18. Inga Loggains Says:

    I love the efforts you have put in this, thank you for all the great articles.

  19. Leigh Mongon Says:

    Howdy very nice site!! Man .. Beautiful .. Superb .. I will bookmark your site and take the feeds additionally…I am happy to find numerous helpful information right here in the submit, we’d like work out extra techniques on this regard, thanks for sharing.

  20. windows media player Says:

    Hiya, I’m really glad I’ve found this information. Nowadays bloggers publish only about gossips and internet and this is actually irritating. A good web site with interesting content, this is what I need. Thank you for keeping this site, I’ll be visiting it. Do you do newsletters? Can not find it.

  21. decorating with mason jars Says:

    Hi! I’ve been reading your web site for a while now and finally got the courage to go ahead and give you a shout out from Humble Tx! Just wanted to tell you keep up the fantastic work!

Leave a Reply

Logged in as . Logout »

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge


Sufficient Scruples:



October 2011
« Aug   Dec »

Links & Feeds:

RSS 2.0

Comments RSS 2.0


Follow KTKeith on Twitter


Powered by WordPress

Get Firefox!

Theme copyright © 2002–2015Mike Little.

Ask the Ethicist!


White Papers:

Bioethics Links: