<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog Against Sexism II: Sexism Still a Health Issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2007/03/13/blog-against-sexism-ii-sexism-still-a-health-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2007/03/13/blog-against-sexism-ii-sexism-still-a-health-issue/</link>
	<description>Bioethics, healthcare policy, and related issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:35:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2007/03/13/blog-against-sexism-ii-sexism-still-a-health-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-61150</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 19:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2007/03/13/blog-against-sexism-ii-sexism-still-a-health-issue/#comment-61150</guid>
		<description>Wow...  I never even noticed that.  Says it in French, too -- &quot;Have a good and happy week&quot;...  thank ghod for being oblivious and not wearing my glasses when opening new pads.  At least it&#039;s in a small font.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;  I never even noticed that.  Says it in French, too &#8212; &#8220;Have a good and happy week&#8221;&#8230;  thank ghod for being oblivious and not wearing my glasses when opening new pads.  At least it&#8217;s in a small font.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tgirsch</title>
		<link>http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2007/03/13/blog-against-sexism-ii-sexism-still-a-health-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-56685</link>
		<dc:creator>tgirsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 05:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2007/03/13/blog-against-sexism-ii-sexism-still-a-health-issue/#comment-56685</guid>
		<description>&quot;the reason while&quot;

Bah!  I meant &quot;the reason why&quot;

Stupid typos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the reason while&#8221;</p>
<p>Bah!  I meant &#8220;the reason why&#8221;</p>
<p>Stupid typos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tgirsch</title>
		<link>http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2007/03/13/blog-against-sexism-ii-sexism-still-a-health-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-56507</link>
		<dc:creator>tgirsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2007/03/13/blog-against-sexism-ii-sexism-still-a-health-issue/#comment-56507</guid>
		<description>I still think you overstate the case.  While it is indeed a male-driven problem, the primary reason while &quot;pro-life&quot; politicians and pharmacists and religious leaders are overwhelmingly male is because those &lt;i&gt;professions&lt;/i&gt; are overwhelmingly male-dominated (itself a serious problem), not because males are considerably more likely to be &quot;pro-life.&quot;

It&#039;s been a while since I&#039;ve seen a poll broken out by gender, but the last time I saw polls that did this, women were no less likely to be anti-choice than their male counterparts (a fact which mystifies me to this day).  We can argue all day that this is directly contrary to their own best interests, or discuss why that is, but we shouldn&#039;t pretend that the demographics of belief are different than they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think you overstate the case.  While it is indeed a male-driven problem, the primary reason while &#8220;pro-life&#8221; politicians and pharmacists and religious leaders are overwhelmingly male is because those <i>professions</i> are overwhelmingly male-dominated (itself a serious problem), not because males are considerably more likely to be &#8220;pro-life.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been a while since I&#8217;ve seen a poll broken out by gender, but the last time I saw polls that did this, women were no less likely to be anti-choice than their male counterparts (a fact which mystifies me to this day).  We can argue all day that this is directly contrary to their own best interests, or discuss why that is, but we shouldn&#8217;t pretend that the demographics of belief are different than they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin T. Keith</title>
		<link>http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2007/03/13/blog-against-sexism-ii-sexism-still-a-health-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-56324</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin T. Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2007/03/13/blog-against-sexism-ii-sexism-still-a-health-issue/#comment-56324</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re certainly right that there is an anti-feminist female contingent - one that is becoming more visible as the religious right encourages them into figurehead roles - and still a large group of women who are not sensitized to these issues. My categorical statement that &quot;only&quot; men harm women was too strong, as any such statement taken literally will be.

But that problem is dwarfed by the male dominance of the anti-woman program of the far right, and more generally by the simple cluelessness of our culture, and especially its male leaders, about women and women&#039;s bodies. We have a culture in which female high school students are punished for simply saying the word &quot;vagina&quot;: a culture in which girls are literally &lt;em&gt;prohibited from speaking the names of parts of their own bodies&lt;/em&gt;, the parts that men get flustered over, naturally. We have a culture in which women are encouraged to diet to the point of death to meet imposed standards of appearance - standards &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; imposed by other women, but reinforced by other women in the competitive hierarchy that earns them rewards for meeting those standards. We have a culture in which almost every aspect of women&#039;s lives is designed around a male model or for men&#039;s convenience, which is why there is almost no support for childcare, no compensation for lost wages or seniority on leaving the work world to raise children, a coordinated assault - by male-led religious groups - on access to both abortion &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; contraception, and persistent undertreatment of women compared to men for the same diagnoses. We have Bill Frist, David Hager, Charles Krauthammer, Leon Kass, and William Cheshire as highly placed, politically powerful doctors, hell-bent on stripping women of their autonomy, and using the power of the government to do so.

I can&#039;t think why it&#039;s controversial to say that misogynist men have had a negative impact on women&#039;s health. I&#039;ll agree that is not the &lt;em&gt;only&lt;/em&gt; impact, but &lt;em&gt;that fact&lt;/em&gt; is not the one that catches my attention about the matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re certainly right that there is an anti-feminist female contingent &#8211; one that is becoming more visible as the religious right encourages them into figurehead roles &#8211; and still a large group of women who are not sensitized to these issues. My categorical statement that &#8220;only&#8221; men harm women was too strong, as any such statement taken literally will be.</p>
<p>But that problem is dwarfed by the male dominance of the anti-woman program of the far right, and more generally by the simple cluelessness of our culture, and especially its male leaders, about women and women&#8217;s bodies. We have a culture in which female high school students are punished for simply saying the word &#8220;vagina&#8221;: a culture in which girls are literally <em>prohibited from speaking the names of parts of their own bodies</em>, the parts that men get flustered over, naturally. We have a culture in which women are encouraged to diet to the point of death to meet imposed standards of appearance &#8211; standards <em>not</em> imposed by other women, but reinforced by other women in the competitive hierarchy that earns them rewards for meeting those standards. We have a culture in which almost every aspect of women&#8217;s lives is designed around a male model or for men&#8217;s convenience, which is why there is almost no support for childcare, no compensation for lost wages or seniority on leaving the work world to raise children, a coordinated assault &#8211; by male-led religious groups &#8211; on access to both abortion <em>and</em> contraception, and persistent undertreatment of women compared to men for the same diagnoses. We have Bill Frist, David Hager, Charles Krauthammer, Leon Kass, and William Cheshire as highly placed, politically powerful doctors, hell-bent on stripping women of their autonomy, and using the power of the government to do so.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t think why it&#8217;s controversial to say that misogynist men have had a negative impact on women&#8217;s health. I&#8217;ll agree that is not the <em>only</em> impact, but <em>that fact</em> is not the one that catches my attention about the matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metaphorical</title>
		<link>http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2007/03/13/blog-against-sexism-ii-sexism-still-a-health-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-55977</link>
		<dc:creator>metaphorical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 04:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2007/03/13/blog-against-sexism-ii-sexism-still-a-health-issue/#comment-55977</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Only a man would write “Have a Happy Period” on a maxipad. Only men would perform 80 - 100,000 unnecessary hysterectomies a year in the US, mostly on women in their reproductive years.&lt;/i&gt;

Really? We know for a fact that no women have absorbed the dominant sexist culture and participated in unnecessary &quot;women&#039;s&quot; operations, no women have participated in sexist ad campaigns, and so on. Happy days. The major project of the the early women&#039;s movement was &quot;consciousness raising.&quot; It&#039;s gratifying to learn that that project was so successful, on tens of millions of women, and there&#039;s been absolutely no backsliding, even with the rise of religious fundamentalism. Groovy, as they said back then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Only a man would write “Have a Happy Period” on a maxipad. Only men would perform 80 &#8211; 100,000 unnecessary hysterectomies a year in the US, mostly on women in their reproductive years.</i></p>
<p>Really? We know for a fact that no women have absorbed the dominant sexist culture and participated in unnecessary &#8220;women&#8217;s&#8221; operations, no women have participated in sexist ad campaigns, and so on. Happy days. The major project of the the early women&#8217;s movement was &#8220;consciousness raising.&#8221; It&#8217;s gratifying to learn that that project was so successful, on tens of millions of women, and there&#8217;s been absolutely no backsliding, even with the rise of religious fundamentalism. Groovy, as they said back then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
