To the mother of the 13 year old boy, no, your son doesn’t have to see that if you don’t want him to, but sooner or later, he’s going to see it, even before he gets married. when your boy grows up and gets married, and marries a beautiful woman, are you gonna keep your hands over his wife’s breasts when he wants to make his first child? are you going to make sure he doesn’t see his wife breastfeeding his firstborn son? did you cover your breasts when he was feeding on you so your husband wouldn’t see it?

and for the person who’s sick of seeing a baby attached to a boob…too bad. Unless you can discover a way to get milk out of your boob and
into your baby’s mouth without anyone seeing it, then you’re on your own.

And to everyone else who thinks breasts are sexual…the whole body is sexual. legs, face, hair, belly, and yet when you go to the beach, does that bother you when a woman in her 20s strolls by in a tight string bikini, showing off her tanned, smooth legs? does it bother you when you see the butterfly tattoo on her nearly bare back? and if you’re in public, this is for the males who’ve read this far, i bet you stare at hot female faces as they walk by. does that bother you?

Talk about discrimination.

If it were up to me,

Shoot me. Just. Shoot me now.

How is it sexual? It’s a body part adapted for feeding babies.

Personally, I’m in favor of more women displaying their breasts in public, but this has nothing whatsoever to do with health, breastfeeding, etc., and lots to do with the fact that my own bottle-fed upbringing left me with a nasty fetish.

Seriously, though, it’s possible to discreetly breast feed in public without hiding in a nasty restroom, and without giving a free show, either. I’ve seen it done.

I’ll never understand what all the fuss is about.

““Gross, I am sick of seeing a baby attached to a boob,” wrote Lauren, a mother of a 4-month-old.”

is just extraordinarily sad.