<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-Choice Tool Confirms Stereotype (One in a Continuing Series . . .)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/</link>
	<description>Bioethics, healthcare policy, and related issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:53:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/comment-page-1/#comment-12962</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 03:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/#comment-12962</guid>
		<description>WOW. I literally stumbled into this from the comments and had to search back to find the hilarious post. Thanks for linking to it. I can&#039;t imagine how this guy interacts with people in his day to day life. I am pretty sure that the girl in the park was either very misunderstood by him, or he just imagined her for our benefit. I&#039;m pretty sure that if the girl in the park was me, he would have gotten much more intelligent arguements that he wrote about.
Thats all I gotta say about that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW. I literally stumbled into this from the comments and had to search back to find the hilarious post. Thanks for linking to it. I can&#8217;t imagine how this guy interacts with people in his day to day life. I am pretty sure that the girl in the park was either very misunderstood by him, or he just imagined her for our benefit. I&#8217;m pretty sure that if the girl in the park was me, he would have gotten much more intelligent arguements that he wrote about.<br />
Thats all I gotta say about that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ent lord</title>
		<link>http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/comment-page-1/#comment-12537</link>
		<dc:creator>ent lord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/#comment-12537</guid>
		<description>Someone send him a copy of &quot;A Modest Proposal&quot;. OMG not only are they aborting children, they are cooking and eating them too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone send him a copy of &#8220;A Modest Proposal&#8221;. OMG not only are they aborting children, they are cooking and eating them too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexis</title>
		<link>http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/comment-page-1/#comment-12523</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/#comment-12523</guid>
		<description>What a knuckleneck! I am super - glad that his antics have unintentionally won hom all the bad publicity? What more could you ask for?
P.S. Please contact Planned Parenthood, because women&#039;s rights ARE human rights!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a knuckleneck! I am super &#8211; glad that his antics have unintentionally won hom all the bad publicity? What more could you ask for?<br />
P.S. Please contact Planned Parenthood, because women&#8217;s rights ARE human rights!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huffers</title>
		<link>http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/comment-page-1/#comment-12126</link>
		<dc:creator>Huffers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/#comment-12126</guid>
		<description>I prefer the &lt;i&gt;&quot;irony is wasted on the stupid&quot;&lt;/i&gt; one -- which he also, notably, left out :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer the <i>&#8220;irony is wasted on the stupid&#8221;</i> one &#8212; which he also, notably, left out <img src='http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin T. Keith</title>
		<link>http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/comment-page-1/#comment-12120</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin T. Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 19:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/#comment-12120</guid>
		<description>OK - I&#039;ll let it go, since it is in a (sort of) dictionary. But satire and sarcasm are different things.

And even if he found the above as a dictionary definition, he still quoted the wrong example. Much more appropriate in his case is the example they give at the end of the line he failed to quote fully:

&lt;em&gt;&quot;Satire is a sort of glass, wherein beholders do generally discover everybody&#039;s face but their own&quot;--Johathan Swift&lt;/em&gt;

Yep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK &#8211; I&#8217;ll let it go, since it is in a (sort of) dictionary. But satire and sarcasm are different things.</p>
<p>And even if he found the above as a dictionary definition, he still quoted the wrong example. Much more appropriate in his case is the example they give at the end of the line he failed to quote fully:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Satire is a sort of glass, wherein beholders do generally discover everybody&#8217;s face but their own&#8221;&#8211;Johathan Swift</em></p>
<p>Yep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huffers</title>
		<link>http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/comment-page-1/#comment-12116</link>
		<dc:creator>Huffers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 16:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/#comment-12116</guid>
		<description>http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/satire

&lt;b&gt;satire&lt;/b&gt;
n : witty language used to convey insults or scorn; &quot;he used sarcasm to upset his opponent&quot;
source: WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University

Sorry, he looked up the right word.

Pete&#039;s still an idiot though. I wonder if he thinks Landover Baptist Church are his allies?
http://www.landoverbaptist.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/satire" rel="nofollow">http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/satire</a></p>
<p><b>satire</b><br />
n : witty language used to convey insults or scorn; &#8220;he used sarcasm to upset his opponent&#8221;<br />
source: WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University</p>
<p>Sorry, he looked up the right word.</p>
<p>Pete&#8217;s still an idiot though. I wonder if he thinks Landover Baptist Church are his allies?<br />
<a href="http://www.landoverbaptist.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.landoverbaptist.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pro-Choice Slut</title>
		<link>http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/comment-page-1/#comment-11984</link>
		<dc:creator>Pro-Choice Slut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/#comment-11984</guid>
		<description>His information is, indeed, freely available on the internet - both his home and work contact information has been repeatedly posted on several websites (by him, not pranksters). 

I sent donations to NARAL, NOW, the ACLU, and Hillary Clinton in his name, and I would have signed him up for membership in the American Communist Party if their website had worked properly. 

He&#039;s not only stupid, he&#039;s a pig and deserves what he gets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His information is, indeed, freely available on the internet &#8211; both his home and work contact information has been repeatedly posted on several websites (by him, not pranksters). </p>
<p>I sent donations to NARAL, NOW, the ACLU, and Hillary Clinton in his name, and I would have signed him up for membership in the American Communist Party if their website had worked properly. </p>
<p>He&#8217;s not only stupid, he&#8217;s a pig and deserves what he gets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomeLlama</title>
		<link>http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/comment-page-1/#comment-11980</link>
		<dc:creator>SomeLlama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/#comment-11980</guid>
		<description>&quot;Update is to ask people not to post private information, especially home or work addresses, phone numbers, or the names or descriptions of family members, on the Web.&quot;

BTW, is wasn&#039;t private information, he has freely posted this information himself on other websites.

When he says this was the reason for deleting posting/comments, it is just a &quot;Red Herring&quot;
http://www.all.org/associates/mtc.htm

Just a friendly FYI :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Update is to ask people not to post private information, especially home or work addresses, phone numbers, or the names or descriptions of family members, on the Web.&#8221;</p>
<p>BTW, is wasn&#8217;t private information, he has freely posted this information himself on other websites.</p>
<p>When he says this was the reason for deleting posting/comments, it is just a &#8220;Red Herring&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.all.org/associates/mtc.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.all.org/associates/mtc.htm</a></p>
<p>Just a friendly FYI <img src='http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kim</title>
		<link>http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/comment-page-1/#comment-11945</link>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 05:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/#comment-11945</guid>
		<description>i got here from the None So Blind blog:
http://www.nonesoblind.org/blog/?p=260

Thanks for this.  It would be really funny if it weren&#039;t so sad.  
--Kim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i got here from the None So Blind blog:<br />
<a href="http://www.nonesoblind.org/blog/?p=260" rel="nofollow">http://www.nonesoblind.org/blog/?p=260</a></p>
<p>Thanks for this.  It would be really funny if it weren&#8217;t so sad.<br />
&#8211;Kim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill O'Loofah</title>
		<link>http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/comment-page-1/#comment-11933</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill O'Loofah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sufficientscruples.com/blog/2006/07/06/anti-choice-tool-confirms-stereotype-one-in-a-continuing-series/#comment-11933</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m one of the people who posted the link to Pete&#039;s address and phone number, which he didn&#039;t exactly take any steps to hide (it shows up on the first page of Google results for marchtogether.com, among other things.)

I get the argument that the guy doesn&#039;t deserve to be harrassed at home, but I&#039;d have a hell of a lot more sympathy if Pete didn&#039;t spend his weekends (as is obvious from photos posted at other sites) invading other peoples&#039; privacy with his big displays of bloody fetuses in DC parks and such. 

Maybe the real answer, for those who feel the need to confront Pete, is to find him when he&#039;s out in public (he drops enough breadcrumbs on his site that it shouldn&#039;t be at all difficult) and call him out there, where you can&#039;t possibly argue a right to privacy?

A final bit of cluelessness: he complained about &quot;Bill&quot; giving out his info, but doesn&#039;t seem to get that Bill&#039;s real name ain&#039;t &quot;Bill O&#039;Loofah.&quot; That was a joke, too, son.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m one of the people who posted the link to Pete&#8217;s address and phone number, which he didn&#8217;t exactly take any steps to hide (it shows up on the first page of Google results for marchtogether.com, among other things.)</p>
<p>I get the argument that the guy doesn&#8217;t deserve to be harrassed at home, but I&#8217;d have a hell of a lot more sympathy if Pete didn&#8217;t spend his weekends (as is obvious from photos posted at other sites) invading other peoples&#8217; privacy with his big displays of bloody fetuses in DC parks and such. </p>
<p>Maybe the real answer, for those who feel the need to confront Pete, is to find him when he&#8217;s out in public (he drops enough breadcrumbs on his site that it shouldn&#8217;t be at all difficult) and call him out there, where you can&#8217;t possibly argue a right to privacy?</p>
<p>A final bit of cluelessness: he complained about &#8220;Bill&#8221; giving out his info, but doesn&#8217;t seem to get that Bill&#8217;s real name ain&#8217;t &#8220;Bill O&#8217;Loofah.&#8221; That was a joke, too, son.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

